Effective Teachers

The single most important school-based factor in improving student academic performance is the quality of the teacher in the classroom. Effective teachers and school leaders not only raise achievement, but they also have the potential to close long-standing achievement gaps for the Latino and African-American students who are nearly 60 percent of our state’s student population. Research makes this clear: students who have a series of strong teachers will soar academically, while those who have weak teachers simply fall further and further behind. However, without a robust evaluation system that emphasizes the impact of a teacher in improving student performance, it is impossible to ensure our highest-need students have access to effective teachers. It is also impossible to identify those teachers who are ineffective at their job.

California needs to strengthen its policies regarding teacher evaluation and ensure school districts use the results of evaluations when making high-stakes staffing decisions, with a focus on ensuring that the highestneed students have access to the best teachers.

Our Recommendations:

1. Overhaul the Teacher and School Leader Evaluation Process. Current evaluation systems do a poor job of measuring teacher and principal quality, making it difficult to spot top performers or identify those who are struggling and in need of support. School districts must develop and implement robust teacher and principal evaluation systems to assess performance. These systems should use multiple measures to evaluate effectiveness, with at least 50 percent based on student academic performance.

Click here for The Education Trust-West's detailed policy recommendations regarding teacher evaluation.

2. Make Staffing Decisions Based on Effectivenes, Not Seniority. School districts must have the flexibility to assign, reassign, layoff, and transfer teachers and administrators based on their effectiveness, school need, and subject-matter needs - without regard to years of service. This recommendation includes repealing “last-hired, first-fired” laws. California is just one of 12 states that requires school districts to use seniority as the primary criterion when making teacher layoff decisions. It is time for California to repeal this dated, bureaucratic, and harmful state mandate, replacing it with a broader law that ensures that other factors, including employee performance, are used when making tough staffing decisions.

3. Protect High-Poverty Schools from the Disproportionate Impact of Layoffs. Until all layoff decisions can be made on the basis of teacher quality (as measured by evaluations that include student performance data), school districts must be given the explicit flexibility to deviate from the process of seniority-based layoffs. Our research has shown that the state’s reduction in force process and the resulting staff churn can result in a disproportionate impact on high-poverty schools. To mitigate potential negative impacts, schools must also be allowed to use existing evaluation data when making layoff decisions. And principals and school communities must also be provided with additional authority to protect their students and instructional programs from involuntary transfers.

4. Extend the Reduction in force Deadline. District leaders must currently make reduction in force decisions early in the year, before accurate financial and budgetary data is available. As a result, many more notices are issued than are necessary. California should extend the March 15 notice date so that district leaders can make more accurate layoff estimates and avoid the damage caused by over-noticing.

5. Collect and Report Teacher Layoff Data. The state should collect and share data on teacher dismissals, by school and by district, so that policymakers and local communities have accurate data to monitor and address reduction in force patterns.

 

Publications on Effective Teachers

New Ed Trust—West Report Shows the Damaging Impact of Teacher Layoff Policies on California’s Highest Need Schools and Students

(OAKLAND, CA)  With school districts across California announcing budget cuts and plans for massive teacher layoffs, a new report by The Education Trust—West titled, Victims of the Churn: The Damaging Impact of California’s Teacher Layoff Policies on Schools, Students and Communities in Three Large School Districts, shows the negative impact of California’s teacher layoff policies on students in high-poverty schools in three urban school districts.  These students were found to bear more than their fair share of the pain when it comes to teacher layoffs, with their schools 65 percent more likely to have a teacher laid off than a low-poverty school.  Some high-poverty schools lost more than 15 percent of their teachers.  (As seen on NBC San Diego)

View more videos at: http://www.nbcsandiego.com.

Effectiveness, Not Seniority: Keeping the Best Teachers in High-Need Schools

California has a critical problem: Too many low-income and minority students are stuck in low-performing schools where they are denied equal access to the educational opportunities they need to succeed in college and a career.

Publication date: 
June 3 2010

Statement by The Education Trust—West on Teacher and Staff Layoffs

(Oakland, CA) – Today, the California Department of Education (CDE) announced that 22,000 teachers and staff in public schools will receive layoff notices.  The pending $2.4 billion cut to California’s public schools comes on top of two years of massive budget cuts that have resulted in tens of thousands of teachers and other staff losing their jobs.     

New Reports Challenge States to Commit to Bold Teacher Effectiveness Reforms in “Race to the Top” Applications

WASHINGTON (November 9, 2009) – The Education Trust and The New Teacher Project (TNTP) today released two reports  challenging states to focus on bold reforms to increase teacher effectiveness in their applications for federal “Race to the Top” funding.

Statement by The Education Trust—West on The Federal Government's Release of "Race to the Top" Fund Regulations and California's Failure to Meet Them

OAKLAND, CA (July 27, 2009)- “Friday, the U.S. Department of Education released regulations for its ‘Race to the Top’ fund that contained sobering news for California. Our state’s ban on using student achievement data to help measure teacher effectiveness threatens our eligibility to apply for portions of the $4.35 billion fund. California’s potential exclusion from this competitive grant process is a blow to students already burdened by massive budget cuts, as well as a forceful wake-up call to state leaders.

Pop Quiz for Parents

  • How effective are your child’s teachers?
  • Does your child receive the same resources as other California students?
  • Are ineffective education program wasting our tax dollars?

If you can’t answer these questions, you’re not alone.  If you want answers to these questions, click on the below document

Publication date: 
April 4 2009